Aquecimento Global: Provável embuste

As universidades da Inglaterra decidiram, há três anos, que se Al Gore não comprovasse suas "irrefutáveis" provas sobre o aquecimento global ele não poderia se pronunciar no meio acadêmico inglês, e pelo que me consta ele silenciou e nada contestou.

Já se apresentou estudos na mídia de que vulcões, animais nos pastos, charcos e vegetação apodrecida causa danos maiores do que a ação humana.

Agora a notícia abaixo dá conta de que houve manipulação nos dados utilizados pela ONU para comprovar que o aquecimento climático é causado, em sua maioria, pela ação humana.

Uma vez que nosso governo, sem consultar a sociedade, se comprometeu com quase 40% de redução, significa que se deve meditar antes de diminuir o ritmo de nosso crescimento econômico.
Aliás, não vi este notícia na mídia brasileira.

UN body wants probe of climate e-mail row

Police are also investigating the leaking of the e-mails

The UN panel on climate change says claims UK scientists manipulated global warming data to boost the argument it is man-made should be investigated.
The allegations emerged after e-mails written by members of the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia were posted on the internet.
Robert Watson, one of the government's chief scientific advisors, has called for all the raw data to be published.
Norfolk police are investigating whether computers were hacked.
'Serious issue'
The UN's Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) is the leading body for assessing climate change science.

The organisation's chairman Dr Rajendra Pachauri told BBC Radio 4's The Report programme the claims were serious and he wants them investigated.
"We will certainly go into the whole lot and then we will take a position on it," he said.
"We certainly don't want to brush anything under the carpet. This is a serious issue and we will look into it in detail."
Last week, the IPCC defended its procedures in the wake of the row.
One of the leaked e-mails suggested CRU head Dr Phil Jones wanted certain papers excluded from the UN's next major assessment of climate science.
Dr Jones, who has stood aside from his job pending the results of an internal review, strenuously denies this was his intention and says other e-mails have been taken out of context.
The row broke out two weeks ago when hundreds of messages between scientists at the CRU and their peers around the world were put on the internet along with other documents.